213141P.pdf   03/07/2023  National Union  v.  Cargill
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3141
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Wollman and Kobes, Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case - Insurance. The district court did not err in determining that 
   Cargill suffered a covered loss resulting directly from an employee's 
   theft when an employee embezzled money by misrepresenting the price at 
   which grain was sold; the district court did not err by concluding there 
   were no disputes as to material facts; the employee exercised such control 
   over the grain that her actions amounted to a covered unlawful taking; the 
   employee's conduct caused Cargill to ship grain to her location and the 
   district court did not err in determining that the amount of covered loss 
   included the shipping costs for the grain; the district court properly 
   applied Minnesota law in determining the starting date for prejudgment 
   interest was the date Cargill send National a notice later.