DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213269P.pdf 08/01/2022 Jane Doe v. Becky Guffin
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3269
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Northern
[PUBLISHED] [[Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiffs alleged defendant Weisenburger
restrained, secluded and abused three of her special education students;
Weisenburger moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity from
claims for infringing the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the
three students, and the district court denied the motion; Weisenburger
appeals. Secluding special education students in a small room and
calm-down corner constituted seizures for Fourth Amendment purposes;
grabbing a student and pushing him into a swimming pool and pinning a
student down to strip off his clothes and force on a bathing suit also
rose to the level of seizures; Weisenburger's actions were a substantial
departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards and
the seizures were unreasonable and a violation of the students' Fourth
Amendment rights; these rights were clearly established, and defendant
Weisenberger was not entitled qualified immunity on four different
violations alleged by the plaintiffs; Weisneberger was entitled to
qualified immunity on the students' substantive due process claims as
their unreasonable seizure claims must rise or fall under the Fourth
Amendment; without a viable substantive due process claim against
Weisenberger, supervisory liability claims founded on the same conduct
necessarily fail.