DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213269P.pdf   08/01/2022  Jane Doe  v.  Becky Guffin
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3269
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Northern   
[PUBLISHED] [[Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiffs alleged defendant Weisenburger restrained, secluded and abused three of her special education students; Weisenburger moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity from claims for infringing the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the three students, and the district court denied the motion; Weisenburger appeals. Secluding special education students in a small room and calm-down corner constituted seizures for Fourth Amendment purposes; grabbing a student and pushing him into a swimming pool and pinning a student down to strip off his clothes and force on a bathing suit also rose to the level of seizures; Weisenburger's actions were a substantial departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards and the seizures were unreasonable and a violation of the students' Fourth Amendment rights; these rights were clearly established, and defendant Weisenberger was not entitled qualified immunity on four different violations alleged by the plaintiffs; Weisneberger was entitled to qualified immunity on the students' substantive due process claims as their unreasonable seizure claims must rise or fall under the Fourth Amendment; without a viable substantive due process claim against Weisenberger, supervisory liability claims founded on the same conduct necessarily fail.