DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213330P.pdf 02/16/2023 Edward Blackorby v. BNSF Railway Company
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3330
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Grasz, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Attorneys' Fees. For the court's prior opinions in this
Federal Railroad Safety Act case, see Blackorby v. BNSF Ry. Co, 936 F.3d
733 (8th Cir. 2019) and Blackorby v. BNSF Ry. Co, 849 F.3d 716 (8th Cir.
2017). Plaintiff prevailed at trial and was awarded $58,240 in damages, as
well as $570,771 in attorneys' fees. BNSF appeals the attorney fee award,
and this court reduces the award by $103,642; the district court did not
err in determining that plaintiff prevailed on his claim that he was
wrongfully retaliated against for reporting his workplace injury, even
though he dismissed his FELA claim; the court rejects BNSF's request for
pro rata reduction of fees based on the gulf between the damage award and
the fee award as the fees were largely drive by the protracted procedural
history of the case, and there is no indication the fees were the result
of an effort by plaintiff to run up fees based on the rancorous nature of
the dispute; however, plaintiff was not entitled to fees related to the
first trial as this court vacated the judgment in the first appeal because
of plaintiff's error in offering a jury instruction that contained a legal
error based on Eighth Circuit precedent; the district court should have
reduced the fee award by the amount expended on the first trial -
$103,642. Affirmed in part and reversed in part, with instructions to
reduce the fee award.