DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213513P.pdf 12/15/2022 United States v. Armondo Heredia, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3513
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Benton,
Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The admission of a confidential informant's
testimony concerning events which took place shortly before the "on or
about" date for the conspiracy alleged in the indictment was proper as it
went to establish the relationships between the co-conspirators; the
testimony was not bad acts evidence since it was offered as direct
evidence establishing defendant's participation in the conspiracy; the
district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to exclude the
testimony under Rule 403; further any error in admitting the informant's
testimony was harmless as the jury verdict is supported by substantial
evidence other than the CI's testimony; surprise is not a basis for
excluding testimony under Rule 403; argument that defendant was prejudiced
by his alleged misidentification in a police report rejected.