DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213513P.pdf   12/15/2022  United States  v.  Armondo Heredia, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3513
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Benton, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The admission of a confidential informant's testimony concerning events which took place shortly before the "on or about" date for the conspiracy alleged in the indictment was proper as it went to establish the relationships between the co-conspirators; the testimony was not bad acts evidence since it was offered as direct evidence establishing defendant's participation in the conspiracy; the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to exclude the testimony under Rule 403; further any error in admitting the informant's testimony was harmless as the jury verdict is supported by substantial evidence other than the CI's testimony; surprise is not a basis for excluding testimony under Rule 403; argument that defendant was prejudiced by his alleged misidentification in a police report rejected.