DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213524P.pdf   08/15/2023  United States  v.  Jaime Campos
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3524
                          and No:  21-3646
                          and No:  21-3677
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Sentencing. Texas case law indicates that a defendant can be convicted of offering to sell a controlled substance under Texas Health and Safety Code Sec. 481.112(a) without having the intent to distribute or dispense drugs; as a result, an offer-to-sell conviction is thus categorically broader than an attempt to commit a controlled substance offense under the Guidelines, and defendant Campos's two prior Texas offer-to-sell convictions do not qualify as predicate controlled substance convictions for purposes of the career-offender enhancement; it was error to impose the enhancement, and his sentence is vacated and the matter remanded for resentencing; similarly, defendant Watson's convictions for violation of the same section did not qualify, and he must be resentenced, as well; defendant Stamps objected to the factual assertions in the PSR that formed the basis for her enhancements for obstruction of justice and making a violent threat and the government failed to present evidence at sentencing to prove the allegations, thereby depriving the court of the opportunity to make a credibility determination as to whose account - defendant or the jail house informer - was more believable; the government thus failed to meet its burden as to both enhancements, and defendant Stamps's sentence is vacated; she shall be resentenced based on the existing record. Judge Grasz, dissenting.