DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213524P.pdf 08/15/2023 United States v. Jaime Campos
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3524
and No: 21-3646
and No: 21-3677
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Texas case law indicates that a defendant can
be convicted of offering to sell a controlled substance under Texas Health
and Safety Code Sec. 481.112(a) without having the intent to distribute or
dispense drugs; as a result, an offer-to-sell conviction is thus
categorically broader than an attempt to commit a controlled substance
offense under the Guidelines, and defendant Campos's two prior Texas
offer-to-sell convictions do not qualify as predicate controlled substance
convictions for purposes of the career-offender enhancement; it was error
to impose the enhancement, and his sentence is vacated and the matter
remanded for resentencing; similarly, defendant Watson's convictions for
violation of the same section did not qualify, and he must be resentenced,
as well; defendant Stamps objected to the factual assertions in the PSR
that formed the basis for her enhancements for obstruction of justice and
making a violent threat and the government failed to present evidence at
sentencing to prove the allegations, thereby depriving the court of the
opportunity to make a credibility determination as to whose account -
defendant or the jail house informer - was more believable; the government
thus failed to meet its burden as to both enhancements, and defendant
Stamps's sentence is vacated; she shall be resentenced based on the
existing record. Judge Grasz, dissenting.