DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213755P.pdf 02/03/2023 Jamie Leonard v. Steven Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3755
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Colloton and Wollman, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. Jail officers sprayed plaintiff with pepper
spray after he refused orders during a search of his cell; he subsequently
clawed out his eye while confined in his cell, and he sued the jail
officers, staff and jail for violation of his Fourth, Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendment rights; the district court granted defendants' motion
for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and plaintiff appeals.
Held: The officer's use of pepper spray was objectively reasonable under
the circumstances; the officers and nurse who examined plaintiff after he
was sprayed did not consciously disregard a serious medical need; decision
to place plaintiff in a cell with a sink where he could wash his eyes, as
opposed to taking him for additional treatment, was not a constitutional
violation; decision by officer who observed plaintiff clawing his eye to
await assistance before entering the cell was not deliberate indifference
as plaintiff was in a frenzied state, was not handcuffed, and presented a
serious safety risk to the officer; denial of plaintiff's medications in
these circumstances did not violate clearly established law, and Nurse
Martin was entitled to qualified immunity on the claim; on plaintiff's
Monell claim, the county did not have a policy or custom of failing to
give detainees medication; the district court did not err in determining
that no adverse inference should be drawn from the deletion of a video as
there was no evidence that the defendants had any intent to deprive
plaintiff of the information's use.