213769P.pdf   02/24/2023  United States  v.  Breon Armstrong
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3769
                          and No:  21-3793
                          and No:  22-1252
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern   
   [PUBLISHED] Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and Sentencing. Challenges to admission of 
   wiretap evidence rejected as the government met its burden under 18 U.S.C. 
   Sec. 2518(3)(c) for issuance of the wiretap order and minimized its 
   surveillance as required by Sec. 2518(5); the district court did not err 
   in denying defendants' requests for a multiple-conspiracies instruction; 
   the evidence was sufficient to support defendants Davis's and Armstrong's 
   convictions for conspiracy to distribute drugs; the district court did not 
   err in imposing a Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement or a Sec. 3B1.1(a) 
   leadership role enhancement in calculating defendant Page's sentence; the 
   district court's drug amount calculation with respect to defendant Davis 
   is affirmed; the district court did not err in imposing a Sec. 
   2D1.1(b)(12) stash house enhancement against defendant Davis; no error in 
   denying defendant Davis's request for a Sec. 3B1.2(b) minor-role 
   reduction; defendant Page's below-guidelines range sentence was not 
   substantively unreasonable.