DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213791P.pdf   11/16/2022  BPP  v.  CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3791
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Melloy and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The fax defendant sent its 
   health-plan-sponsor clients, such as plaintiff, regarding changes in 
   opioid-coverage-limitations was not covered by the Act because it was not 
   an unsolicited advertisement; as no jury could find the fax was an 
   unsolicited advertisement under the Act, the district court properly 
   granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.