DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213816P.pdf   11/21/2022  United States  v.  Eric Griggs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3816
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Gruender and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and Sentencing. Police officers' use of a 
   seized phone to contact defendant and set up a drug deal with defendant 
   did not violate the Wiretap Act; officers had probable cause to approach 
   defendant's car; inaccurate statement in the search warrant application 
   did not require suppression of the evidence when the rest of the 
   information provided established probable cause; even assuming certain 
   testimony the government introduced was false, there was no reasonable 
   likelihood it affected the verdict; challenge to jury instructions 
   rejected;; evidentiary arguments rejected; no error in imposing an 
   enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice; 
   sentence was not substantively unreasonable.