213849P.pdf   03/13/2023  United States  v.  James Norris, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3849
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not violate Fed. R. 
   Crim. P. 32.1(c)(1) when it denied defendant's motion to terminate 
   supervision or modify the conditions of his supervised release without 
   providing him with counsel and a hearing; no due-process violation 
   occurred; under this court's precedent in U.S. v. Mosby, 710 F.3d 925 (8th 
   Cir. 2013), neither 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e) nor relevant case law requires 
   the district court to explain its denial of early termination of 
   supervised release; the district court did not abuse its discretion by 
   refusing to modify the provision on defendant's internet and computer use. 
   Judge Kelly, concurring.