221046P.pdf   01/26/2023  Dennis Ryno  v.  City of Waynesville
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-1046
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. At the time the defendant officer arrested 
   plaintiff, a reasonable officer would have believed plaintiff had 
   committed or was committing the offenses of violating an order of 
   protection, stalking or harassment; as a result, plaintiff's arrest was 
   not a Fourth Amendment violation, and the officers were entitled to 
   qualified immunity; even if the officers did not have probable cause to 
   arrest plaintiff, his right to be free from unreasonable seizure was not 
   clearly established under these facts; with respect to plaintiff's claim 
   for conspiracy to cause false arrest or unreasonable seizure, defendant 
   was, at the time of the incident, subject to a probation condition 
   requiring him to submit to searches of his person and residence; under 
   these circumstances, the Fourth Amendment requires no more than a 
   reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the plaintiff's house, even 
   without a warrant, and the officers had a reasonable suspicion; the court 
   assumes, without deciding, that the reasonable suspicion standard also 
   applied to a search of the plaintiff's computer; the officers were 
   entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's unreasonable search claim.