DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

221567P.pdf   03/23/2023  Lowell Lundstrom, Jr.  v.  Watts Guerra LLP
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-1567
                          and No:  22-1579
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Northern   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Erickson and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Contracts. A reasonable jury could find that defendant was bound on an ostensible agency theory by its litigation partner's promise to pay plaintiff $10,000 a month for the term of months for his work in signing up clients; similarly, the jury could also find that defendant was bound by the litigation partner's promise, as apparent agent, to pay plaintiff $50,000 for a new truck to accomplish his work on defendant's behalf; the jury did not err in finding a third promise to pay plaintiff a $3.4 million non-discretionary bonus was not included in the oral contract between plaintiff and the litigation partner; claim that the award was inadequate rejected as there was an obvious basis for the compensatory damage award.