221796P.pdf   07/31/2023  Anastasia Wullschleger  v.  Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-1796
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Class Actions. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, 
   see Wullschleger v. Royal Canin, U.S.A., Inc., 953 F.3d 519 (8th Cir. 
   2020), holding plaintiff's antitrust and unjust enrichment claims had 
   important federal ingredients requiring explication of federal law and 
   making it error to remand the matter to state court. On remand, plaintiff 
   eliminated every reference to federal law, but the district court refused 
   to remand the case, finding federal-question jurisdiction still existed. 
   The court eventually granted defendants' motion to dismiss, leading to 
   this appeal. The court finds, however, that the elimination of all federal 
   claims in the complaint destroyed federal jurisdiction, and the district 
   court erred in dismissing the case; remanded to the district court with 
   directions to remand the case to state court.