DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

221830P.pdf   01/08/2024  Animal Legal Defense Fund  v.  Kimberly Reynolds
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-1830
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Constitutional law (First Amendment). For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Reynolds, 8 F.4th 781 (8th Cir. 2021), where the court ruled that a provision of Iowa law prohibiting making a false statement or misrepresentation in an employment application was insufficiently tailored and unconstitutional because it encompassed statements that were not material to an employment decision. Iowa passed a new law - Iowa Code Sec. 717A.3(b)(1)(a)-(b)(2019) - addressing the issue and several organizations challenged the new law. The district court concluded that an intent requirement rendered the new law view-point-based and a violation of the First Amendment because it targeted speakers who have negative views of agricultural production facilities. The state officials appeal. Held: The Iowa statute is not a viewpoint=based restriction on speech, but rather a permissible restriction on intentionally false speech undertaken to accomplish a legally cognizable harm.