DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
221830P.pdf 01/08/2024 Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Kimberly Reynolds
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-1830
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Constitutional law (First Amendment). For the court's prior
opinion in the matter, see Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Reynolds, 8 F.4th
781 (8th Cir. 2021), where the court ruled that a provision of Iowa law
prohibiting making a false statement or misrepresentation in an employment
application was insufficiently tailored and unconstitutional because it
encompassed statements that were not material to an employment decision.
Iowa passed a new law - Iowa Code Sec. 717A.3(b)(1)(a)-(b)(2019) -
addressing the issue and several organizations challenged the new law. The
district court concluded that an intent requirement rendered the new law
view-point-based and a violation of the First Amendment because it
targeted speakers who have negative views of agricultural production
facilities. The state officials appeal. Held: The Iowa statute is not a
viewpoint=based restriction on speech, but rather a permissible
restriction on intentionally false speech undertaken to accomplish a
legally cognizable harm.