DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
221922P.pdf 06/05/2023 Stacey Johnson v. Tim Griffin
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-1922
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Erickson and Stras, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Plaintiff, an Arkansas death row
inmate, sought DNA testing under Arkansas's Act 1780 (DNA testing
statute); the state courts denied his request because he could not meet
the statutory prerequisite for testing in that none of the evidence which
might result from the testing could advance his claim of actual innocence
or raise a reasonable probability that he did not commit the murder. In
this Section 1983 action, plaintiff alleged that Act 1780, as interpreted
by the Arkansas Supreme Court, violated his federal constitutional rights
to due process and access to the courts. The district court determined
that plaintiff had standing to challenge the Act on procedural due process
grounds and that the defendant officials were not entitled to qualified
immunity; defendants appeal these two rulings. Held: plaintiff has
sufficiently alleged an injury in fact that was caused by the defendant
and that would be redressed by the relief sought in his Section 1983
action; he thus has standing to bring his procedural due process challenge
to Act 1780; the defendants are not immune from suit under the Eleventh
Amendment because plaintiff seeks prospective declaratory and injunctive
relief and has alleged a sufficient connection between the defendants and
Act 1780's enforcement as the defendants either hold the evidence and
refuse to provide it or have refused to agree to DNA testing and opposed
plaintiff's Act 1780 petition in state court. Judge Stras, concurring.