DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
222012P.pdf 08/16/2023 Marco Gonzalez v. Salem Shahin
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-2012
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Torts. Plaintiff alleged the defendant physicians and medical
providers were negligent in treating him with Bactrim, an antibiotic, and
in failing to discontinue the drug without consulting the product label.
The jury returned a verdict for all defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
Held: This court lacked jurisdiction to review the underlying judgment on
the jury verdict because the notice of appeal was untimely; the court does
have jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of plaintiff's
Rule 59 motion for a new trial; the district court's supplemental comments
to the jury concerning the product label, when read in connection with the
instructions and other comments from the court, left all fact issues to
the jury and were not an abuse of the district court's discretion; the
court's comments about plaintiff's lawyer were not plain error; the
district court's limits on plaintiff's cross-examination of a medical
expert were not an abuse of the district court's discretion; the trial
court's denial of additional time for cross-examination of the witness was
not plain error; award of costs in connection with depositions was not an
abuse of the district court's discretion.