DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

222126P.pdf   06/29/2023  Andrew Hutchinson  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-2126
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. The district court did not err in 
   concluding that the United States, if a private person, would not be 
   liable for plaintiff's son's injury because of Arkansas's recreational-use 
   statute; Arkansas's soccer-goal-safety statute does not change the result, 
   nor does plaintiffs' argument that the recreational-use statute should not 
   apply because only military personnel can use the field where the boy was 
   injured; any duties the United States owed plaintiffs as tenants in 
   military housing did not extend to the field; the recreational-use 
   statute's application is not limited to organizations and it covers 
   persons, such as plaintiffs.