DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

222268P.pdf   08/31/2022  Crista Eggers  v.  Robert Evnen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-2268
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Elections. Plaintiffs sued the Nebraska Secretary of State, alleging a provision of the Nebraska constitution that establishes a signature requirement for ballot initiatives violates the Equal Protection Clause, and the district court entered a preliminary injunction barring the Secretary from enforcing the provision. The provision in question states that in order for a initiative to be placed on the ballot, the signatories must "be so distributed as to include five percent of the registered voters of each of the two-fifths of the counties of the state." Plaintiffs' claim that the provisions restricts a fundamental right is foreclosed by circuit precedent as this court has held that no right can qualify as fundamental for purposes of equal-protection analysis unless it is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, and the right to place initiatives on a state ballot is not a right created by the U.S. Constitution, but is a right created by state law; plaintiffs must therefore prove that the the provision cannot survive even a rational-basis scrutiny, and they have not show they have even a "fair chance" of carrying that burden; as such, they have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits; the other Dataphase factors also weigh in defendant's favor, and the injunction is vacated. Judge Kelly, dissenting.