DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
222268P.pdf 08/31/2022 Crista Eggers v. Robert Evnen
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-2268
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Stras, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Elections. Plaintiffs sued the Nebraska Secretary of State,
alleging a provision of the Nebraska constitution that establishes a
signature requirement for ballot initiatives violates the Equal Protection
Clause, and the district court entered a preliminary injunction barring
the Secretary from enforcing the provision. The provision in question
states that in order for a initiative to be placed on the ballot, the
signatories must "be so distributed as to include five percent of the
registered voters of each of the two-fifths of the counties of the state."
Plaintiffs' claim that the provisions restricts a fundamental right is
foreclosed by circuit precedent as this court has held that no right can
qualify as fundamental for purposes of equal-protection analysis unless it
is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, and the right to place initiatives
on a state ballot is not a right created by the U.S. Constitution, but is
a right created by state law; plaintiffs must therefore prove that the the
provision cannot survive even a rational-basis scrutiny, and they have not
show they have even a "fair chance" of carrying that burden; as such, they
have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits; the other Dataphase
factors also weigh in defendant's favor, and the injunction is vacated.
Judge Kelly, dissenting.