222653P.pdf   12/27/2023  United States  v.  Antoine Maxwell
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-2653
                          and No:  22-2655
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Western   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The district court did not 
   err in denying defendant Harden's motion to suppress evidence seen during 
   the warrantless entry to his residence as the circumstances were 
   sufficiently exigent to enter the home as there were very young children 
   in the home who were either unattended or with an armed robbery suspect; 
   as a result, the warrantless entry was reasonable and constitutional under 
   the exigent circumstances doctrine; the evidence was sufficient to support 
   defendants' convictions for conspiracy to interfere with commerce by 
   robbery and defendant Maxwell's conviction for being a felon in possession 
   of a firearm; the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing 
   to give defendant Harden's instruction on implicit bias; the district 
   court did not err at sentencing in determining defendant Harden's relevant 
   conduct included the use of a firearm and bodily injury - see Guidelines 
   Sec. 1B1.3; nor did the district court clearly err in concluding Harden 
   obstructed justice under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 by committing perjury in 
   his trial testimony.