222731P.pdf   08/10/2023  Angela Cantrell  v.  Coloplast Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-2731
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Products liability. Plaintiff alleged she was injured by the 
   implantation of defendant's surgical mesh device; the district court 
   excluded plaintiff's expert opinions and testimony under Rule 
   26(a)(2)(B)(ii) and then granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. 
   Plaintiff appeals. The district court did not err in finding the expert 
   witness's supplemental declaration was untimely under the court's 
   scheduling order, and the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing 
   to consider the supplemental declaration; the court did not err when it 
   decided to exclude the expert witness report and declaration without 
   considering lesser sanctions; in the absence of admissible evidence 
   establishing causation, plaintiff could not establish an essential element 
   of her case, and the district court did not err in granting defendant 
   summary judgment.