DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
222870P.pdf 08/30/2023 United States v. Edell Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-2870
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] Published Order. Before the Court En Banc. Appellant's petition for
rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for panel rehearing is also
denied. Judges Erickson, Grasz, and Stras would grant the petition for
rehearing en banc. Judge Colloton concurring in the denial of the petition
for rehearing en banc. Judge Stras, with whom Judge Erickson and Judge
Grasz join, dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en
banc.
222870P.pdf 06/02/2023 United States v. Edell Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-2870
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Benton,
Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The instruction given on the elements
required for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(1) was not
erroneous; defendant's argument that the court should have provided the
jury with the statutory language from Sec. 921(a)(20) and allowed the jury
to decide whether his right to possess a firearm had been restored is
foreclosed by this court's decision in U.S. v. Stanko, 491 F.3d 408 (8th
Cir. 2007) as the question of whether a conviction satisfies the criteria
under Sec. 921(a)(20) is a question of law for the court; the instruction
was also consistent with Rehaif as it allowed defendant to argue, and a
jury to find, that he lacked the requisite knowledge due to a belief that
his rights had been restored; the district court did not abuse its
discretion in answering two questions from the jury; argument that 18
U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because
his prior drug offenses were non-violent and do not show that he is more
dangerous than the average person rejected; Congress acted within the
historical tradition when it enacted the prohibition on possession of
firearms by felons.