DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

222870P.pdf   08/30/2023  United States  v.  Edell Jackson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-2870
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] Published Order. Before the Court En Banc. Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for panel rehearing is also denied. Judges Erickson, Grasz, and Stras would grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Colloton concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Stras, with whom Judge Erickson and Judge Grasz join, dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. 222870P.pdf 06/02/2023 United States v. Edell Jackson U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 22-2870 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Benton, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The instruction given on the elements required for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(1) was not erroneous; defendant's argument that the court should have provided the jury with the statutory language from Sec. 921(a)(20) and allowed the jury to decide whether his right to possess a firearm had been restored is foreclosed by this court's decision in U.S. v. Stanko, 491 F.3d 408 (8th Cir. 2007) as the question of whether a conviction satisfies the criteria under Sec. 921(a)(20) is a question of law for the court; the instruction was also consistent with Rehaif as it allowed defendant to argue, and a jury to find, that he lacked the requisite knowledge due to a belief that his rights had been restored; the district court did not abuse its discretion in answering two questions from the jury; argument that 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because his prior drug offenses were non-violent and do not show that he is more dangerous than the average person rejected; Congress acted within the historical tradition when it enacted the prohibition on possession of firearms by felons.