DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

223007P.pdf   06/13/2023  United States  v.  Christopher Hester
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-3007
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Grasz and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Asset Forfeiture. The district court struck Hester's claim as 
   a sanction for violating Rule G(6) by providing incomplete information 
   regarding his claim, including insufficient responses to the government's 
   interrogatories; the district court erred in striking the claim under Rule 
   G(8) as this court cannot conclude, on this record, that Hester knew or 
   should have known that Rule G(6) obligated him to provide more information 
   than had been provided.