DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

223399P.pdf   03/08/2024  Thomas Springs  v.  Dexter Payne
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-3399
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, Circuit Judge] Prisoner case - Habeas - Death Penalty. The Arkansas Supreme Court did not err in concluding that while Springs' trial attorney performed deficiently in failing to call Springs's son as a mitigating circumstances witness, Springs was not prejudiced by this failure, as there was no reasonable probability, given the extensive evidence against Springs and the gruesome nature of his crime, that he would have received a different sentence if the son had testified in the sentencing phase of the case; the district court did not err in concluding that the Arkansas Supreme Court's decision did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and the denial of habeas relief is affirmed.