DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

223468P.pdf   01/09/2023  Robert Leflar  v.  Target Corporation
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-3468
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central   
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Erickson and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Class Action. The district court did not apply the correct standard in evaluating whether the amount in controversy met the requirement for removal of a class action; under the Class Action Fairness Act there is no anti-removal presumption, much less a requirement to resolve all doubts about federal jurisdiction in favor of remand; the district court's failure to consider the post-removal declaration of Target's lead compliance consultant that the law suit would require Target to spend over $7.5 million if plaintiff prevails, effectively denied the company the opportunity to establish its claim of federal jurisdiction; the district court's remand order is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further consideration.