223567P.pdf   11/17/2023  United States  v.  Robin Roberts
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-3567
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Stras and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. While the expert witness's testimony 
   regarding the victim's response to the sexual assault charged in the case 
   came close to improper vouching, any error in admitting the testimony was 
   harmless, as the vouching was indirect, and defendant made several 
   inculpatory statements to police from which the jury could have 
   independently concluded defendant committed the crime; on this record, 
   defendant was not entitled to an intoxication defense instruction; the 
   district court did not err under Rule 106 in refusing to admit additional 
   portions of statements defendant made to the police as the excluded 
   portions were self-serving hearsay and were not required to alleviate a 
   misleading impression.