DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
231381P.pdf 05/24/2023 Nicholas Brunts v. Walmart, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 23-1381
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Benton and Grasz, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Class Actions. In this action plaintiffs argued that
defendant engaged in misleading and deceptive advertising by labeling
certain cough suppressants as "non drowsy;" the action was filed in
Missouri state court, and defendant removed it to federal court; the
district court then granted plaintiffs' motion to remand, concluding
defendant had not met the Class Action Fairness Act's jurisdictional
requirements of showing the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million.
Held: defendant did show the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million as
defendant's declaration that it sold more than $5 million of the product
in Missouri during the relevant time period was sufficient to meet the
Act's amount in controversy requirement at this pleading stage.