DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

231381P.pdf   05/24/2023  Nicholas Brunts  v.  Walmart, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  23-1381
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Benton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Class Actions. In this action plaintiffs argued that defendant engaged in misleading and deceptive advertising by labeling certain cough suppressants as "non drowsy;" the action was filed in Missouri state court, and defendant removed it to federal court; the district court then granted plaintiffs' motion to remand, concluding defendant had not met the Class Action Fairness Act's jurisdictional requirements of showing the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million. Held: defendant did show the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million as defendant's declaration that it sold more than $5 million of the product in Missouri during the relevant time period was sufficient to meet the Act's amount in controversy requirement at this pleading stage.