DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

983732P.pdf   03/24/2000  Concord Boat  v.  Brunswick Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  98-3732
                          and No:  99-1488
                          and No:  99-1488
                          and No:  98-4042
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
   Civil case - Antitrust. $133 million Sherman Act and Clayton 
   Act judgments in favor of plaintiff boat builders against 
   Brunswick, market leader in stern drive engine manufacturing, 
   reversed; Clayton Act claims were time barred; evidence was 
   insufficient as a matter of law to permit jury to find Brunswick's 
   discount programs and acquisitions restrained trade or 
   monopolized the market in violation of the Sherman Act.