DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
991631P.pdf 01/13/2000 United States v. Gregory Ervasti
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 99-1631
and No: 99-1636
District of Minnesota
Criminal case - criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to
support mail fraud convictions; instructions on intent to
defraud were not erroneous; court did not err in upholding
IRS search; indictment alleged separate offenses and
convictions did not violate Double Jeopardy; no error in
imposing enhancement for supervisory role in the offense;
district court properly calculated amount of loss; no error
in denying acceptance of responsibility reduction; court
properly applied Guideline Sec. 5G1.2(d) concerning
consecutive sentences; provision of supervised release
concerning incurring new lines of credit or credit charges
was within court's discretion; matter remanded for correction
of typographical error in restitution order.