DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

991631P.pdf   01/13/2000  United States  v.  Gregory Ervasti
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  99-1631
                          and No:  99-1636
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to 
   support mail fraud convictions; instructions on intent to 
   defraud were not erroneous; court did not err in upholding 
   IRS search; indictment alleged separate offenses and 
   convictions did not violate Double Jeopardy; no error in 
   imposing enhancement for supervisory role in the offense; 
   district court properly calculated amount of loss; no error 
   in denying acceptance of responsibility reduction; court 
   properly applied Guideline Sec. 5G1.2(d) concerning 
   consecutive sentences; provision of supervised release 
   concerning incurring new lines of credit or credit charges 
   was within court's discretion; matter remanded for correction 
   of typographical error in restitution order.