DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

992897P.pdf   11/08/2002  United States  v.  Chevie Kehoe
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  99-2897
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
Criminal case - criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support RICO conviction, as the government proved the existence of an enterprise and that defendant conspired to commit a substantive RICO offense and committed murder to further the enterprise; indictment for both substantive RICO offense and conspiring to engage in a RICO substantive offense does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; conviction for murder in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1959 did not violate the Tenth Amendment; alleged inconsistency between guilt phase and penalty phase findings did not invalidate guilt finding; U.S. Attorney who had worked in Kehoe's appointed counsel's case during the time frame of pre-trial proceedings was walled off from this case, and her presence in the U.S. Attorney's office did not require the office's disqualification; court did not err in refusing to sever this trial from that of the co-defendant; court did not err in refusing to grant immunity to co-defendant; evidence was sufficiently corroborated; court did not err in refusing to order psychiatric exam for a government witness; court did not err in admitting expert testimony regarding handwriting analysis; challenge to jury instructions rejected; while prosecutor's comments concerning witness's testimony might have been improper vouching, they did not rise to the level of plain error.