DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
992897P.pdf 11/08/2002 United States v. Chevie Kehoe
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 99-2897
Eastern District of Arkansas
Criminal case - criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support
RICO conviction, as the government proved the existence of an
enterprise and that defendant conspired to commit a substantive RICO
offense and committed murder to further the enterprise; indictment for
both substantive RICO offense and conspiring to engage in a RICO
substantive offense does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause;
conviction for murder in aid of racketeering in violation of
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1959 did not violate the Tenth Amendment;
alleged inconsistency between guilt phase and penalty phase findings
did not invalidate guilt finding; U.S. Attorney who had worked in
Kehoe's appointed counsel's case during the time frame of pre-trial
proceedings was walled off from this case, and her presence in the
U.S. Attorney's office did not require the office's disqualification;
court did not err in refusing to sever this trial from that of the
co-defendant; court did not err in refusing to grant
immunity to co-defendant; evidence was sufficiently corroborated;
court did not err in refusing to order psychiatric exam for a government
witness; court did not err in admitting expert testimony regarding
handwriting analysis; challenge to jury instructions rejected; while
prosecutor's comments concerning witness's testimony might have
been improper vouching, they did not rise to the level of plain error.