OPINIONS ARE POSTED DAILY BETWEEN 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. Today is: [ Monday October 03, 2022 ] The most recent opinions are for: [ 10/03/2022 ]  
DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office                          as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211865U.pdf  10/03/2022  Rafael Segovia-Yanes  v.  Merrick Garland
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   21-1865
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Erickson, and Stras, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Issue not raised before the BIA would not be considered.
212724U.pdf  10/03/2022  United States  v.  Diondrey Hardwict
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   21-2724
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Melloy and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. Anders case. Defendant's appeal fell within the scope of the valid appeal waiver in his guilty plea agreement. Challenge to restitution order rejected.
221132U.pdf  10/03/2022  United States  v.  Austin Rockwood
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   22-1132
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Western   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly, and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in calculating defendant's base offense level under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) as his Iowa conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is a predicate offense for purposes of the Guidelines section - see U.S. v. Bailey, 37 F.4th 467, 469-470 (8th Cir. 2022).
221208U.pdf  10/03/2022  United States  v.  Brandy Fish
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   22-1208
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly, and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant was statutorily ineligible for probation, and the the district court properly excluded probation as a sentence under Sec. 3553(a)(3); defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable.
221984U.pdf  10/03/2022  United States  v.  Rafeal Mendez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   22-1984
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Eastern   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Shepherd, Kelly, and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable.